Proposal view
Proposal Type: Individual Paper 
Domain: Teaching and Instructional Design 
SIG: Conceptual Change 
Type Submitted Paper 
Equipment PC and projector
Paper Details
Title Scientific precursor models construction: A science learning and teaching approach in preschool education.
Abstract
In this paper some results are presented about young children scientific precursor models construction using scientific procedural and communication skills. The aim of this research was to describe how young children aged 5-6 years construct their explanations concerning different natural phenomena in a dialogical context. This exploratory study used a qualitative data collection and analysis, and was conducted in three phases: pre-interview, instructional process and post-interview. In this paper we present results about Flotation precursor model construction based on the objects material´s nature as an indicator of an intuitive approach to density. At individuals interviews we asked the children to predict the possible flotation or immersion of cubes made of different materials and of different sizes. After they had carried out their experiments, we asked them to compare the experimental results with their initial predictions and give their explanations. On analyzing children’s answers we realized that several children were lead to both the construction of a precursor model and a general qualitative upgrade of reasoning. We conclude that children were able to consider flotation more accurately in terms of the event itself. They changed their way of justifying flotation towards a scientific way of looking at flotation. Notable differences occurred among the children who expressed non relevant or no-scientific explanations, therefore we assume that educational activities were effective. In the context of preschool education this approach could improve scientific teaching and learning to a better understanding of science topics in order to develop the basis of scientific literacy.

 
Summary
Research questions

 

1.- Which are children´s aged 5-6 ideas about flotation/immersion phenomena after a designed instructional process?

2.- Are children aged 5-6 able to construct a precursor model based on a density approach?

 

Aims

 

1.- To identify children’s aged 5-6 conceptual evolution in flotation/immersion phenomena.

2.- To identify children’s aged 5-6 precursor models construction.


Methodology

 

The design used in this exploratory research was a case study (Merrian, 1998) in a public kindergarten classroom in Barcelona, Spain, using a qualitative approach. The study was conducted in a public preschool with 20 children aged 5-6 years who were assigned to five groups which purpose was to instigate ideas exchange (Rafal, 1996). The research was constructed en three parts: a) pre-interview, b) instructional process, and c) post-interview. Interviews about events (Osborne, 1980; Osborne and Freyberg, 1991) were used both in the pre-interview and in the post-interview. The purpose in the interview was to determine the children’s existing knowledge and experience about floating and sinking. The instructional process was an attempt to support and develop the children’s conceptual understanding of floating and sinking. The teaching approach was collaborative (Boulter, 2000), using a guided discovery learning (Ausubel and Robinson, 1969) and following an orientation, experimental session and elaboration progression in the instructional process (Driver and Oldham, 1986; Brown and Palincsar, 1989, in Havu-Nuutinen, 2005). The post-interview was an attempt to identify changes in children’s reasoning and scientific precursor model construction. Individuals pre-interviews, instructional sessions, and individual post-interviews were audio and video recorded and the material was later analyzed. The qualitative analysis of the results has two aspects. On the one hand, children’s reasoning was formed and classified in categories. On the other hand, it was attempted to keep up with changes in children’s answers between the introductive and the final period of the instruction.

 

Theoretical framework

 

The research is based on the sociocultural perspective on learning (Vygotsky, 1978), considering the rol played by social interactions on knowledge construction (Wertsch, 1990; Wertsch y Toma, 1995), particularly in children’s scientific knowledge development (Chinn, 1998); the scientific thought development (Kuhn, 1993); language, discourse and argumentation roles played in scientific education (Driver, et al., 2000; Duschl y Osborne, 2002); conceptual evolution on scientific learning from children’s intuitive ideas (Driver, Guesne y Tiberghien, 1985; Harlen, 1998); scientific procedural skills and attitudes development and evolution in primary education (Giordan, 1985 y Harlen, 1998); teaching and learning contexts in scientific education (Mercer, 2004), and scientific precursors models construction (Lemeignan, G. y A. Weil-Barais. 1993).

 

Findings

 

The results of this research appears to support the idea that children aged 5-6 can build a precursor model of flotation and immersion of objects based on an intuitive concept of density. There were 7 children (41.2 % taking into account that 3 children already in the initial phase considered material a factor related with flotation) that formed such precursor model during the experimental process, 1 of them has given contradictory answers and in the group (9 subjects), where children initially gave answers related to the factor weight, 6 of them shifted to the precursor model. We also point out that some children used a representation based on approaches of the factors of weight and volume. In the initial phase, were 9 children predicted that flotation depended on these factors, 3 of them at the final period continued using this approach. Four children that initially gave contradictory answers or no answers shifted to weight approach. There were two particular cases in which 1 children did not answer either the initial and the final period and another one that shifted from the material approach to no answer (regression).

These findings are similar to those in Koliopoulos, et al.’s (2003) research. They worked with 20 children aged 5-6 and founded that children’s answers to the question why bodies sink or float initially were also confused. In other cases, the ideas of children seemed to be connected with the factor of bodies’ weight, which is often with volume, although children attributed to these concepts their own empirical-intuitive meanings. Categorizing the entire range of children’s explanations, both in the initial period and in the final period, they found the next categories: Precursor model which connects either flotation or immersion with the bodies’material; representations that connect flotation or immersion with weight or volume; contradictory representations, and no answers.

In order to evaluate our instructional process, we compare our results from those of Kaliopoulus et al. (2003) and we found that in our study there are fewer children giving contradictory answers in the pre-test and more children relating weight or volume to flotation. This could be because in a previous work (a pilot test) we worked with children’s initial ideas about floating and sinking using a weight approach. On the other hand, in this study, children giving contradictory answers shifted to weight/volume or material/density approaches, and mostly giving weight/volume answers shifted to material/density approach. In Kaliopoulus et al.’s (2003) work most of the children with a weight/volume approach remained in this category and mostly in the contradictory representations category shifted to weight/volume or material/density approaches.

In this study at the final period, 55% of the children gave scientific explanations, and 35% remained in the initial reasoning either in the weight/volume or material/density approaches. The rest (10%) regressed or remained in the lower categories. We conclude that children were able to consider flotation more accurately in terms of the event itself. They changed their way of justifying flotation towards a scientific way of looking at flotation. Notable differences occurred among the children who expressed non relevant or no-scientific explanations, therefore we assume that educational activities were effective and we think that this findings contribute to enlarge preschool curriculum where children use procedural and discursive skills in hand on activities leading to changes in their reasoning.

 
Keywords Early childhood
Learning processes/strategies
Science education
Appendices
Authors
Name Surname Institution Country e-mail EARLI Number Presenting
Sabrina Canedo Ibarra University of Barcelona Spain sabrinacanedo@hotmail.com   *  
Josep Castello Escandell University of Barcelona Spain josep.castello@ub.es    
Paloma Garcia Wehrle University of Barcelona Spain palomagarcia@ub.es    
Visit NQcontent
© European Association for Research on Learning and Instruction, 2012 All rights reserved.