All the proposals will be reviewed. Paper, poster and roundtable presentations will be recognised as equally valid formats of presentation and will be treated in an identical manner.
Depending on the format and type of research being submitted, the proposals will be reviewed by two referees, a senior researcher and an advanced PhD-student, according to the following criteria:
- Topic (originality, choice of problems, importance of issues, relevance to the conference themes, theoretical/practical significance);
- Framework (theoretical/conceptual/practical framework, rationale, literature review);
- Methodology (research design, method, quality of data source);
- Analyses and interpretation (significance of conclusions and implications for research, practice, policy; relationship of conclusions to findings, generalisability or usefulness of findings or concepts);
- Written proposal (clarity and structure).
The pre-announcement proposal should be according to the following stylistic requirements:
- Times New Roman 12 point
- Double-spaced, no hyphenation
- http://www.apastyle.org/
Make sure you are pointing out which presentation format you are applying for. Clearly state your name, e-mail, country, university, specialisation, research experience and indicate the topic according to EARLI SIGs (see the EARLI website: http://www.earli.org).
The pre-announcement proposals will be accepted, rejected or they will be offered an alternative presentation format. The decisions will be emailed to you by February the 7th, 2007.
Interested in reviewing?
JURE invites advanced PhD-students who would like to conduct reviews in collaboration with a senior and act as a discussant at a paper session to contact jure2007@server.edu.u-szeged.hu.
